The Federal Reserve can fairly be said to be cutting interest rates because of Donald Trump. But the move has little to do with the unprecedented and buffoonish levels of political pressure this president is placing on the U.S. central bank, whose functioning is key to domestic and global economic stability.
Instead, Fed officials made clear in minutes from their July 30-31 meeting released this week that they are, instead, reacting to Trump's erratic mismanagement of the economy.
Naturally the Fed, which is seeking more than ever to assert its political independence now that it's facing frequent Twitter tirades from the White House, did not mention Trump by name.
But the vestiges of his deepening trade war, and the impact it is having on world economy and in turn the United States, were cited as the leading rationale for the easing of monetary conditions, which represented an about-face from predictions of a hike as recently as late 2018.
Officials with a current vote on the Federal Open Market Committee said that while "the overall outlook remained favorable, significant risks and uncertainties attending the outlook remained."
The source of uncertainty was distinctly Trumpian: "In particular, sluggish U.S. business fixed investment spending and manufacturing output had lingered, suggesting that risks and uncertainties associated with weak global economic growth and in international trade were weighing on the domestic economy."
Recall, boosting business investment was supposed to be a key justification for Trump's corporate tax cuts. Things haven't quite panned out that way, disproving Republican trickle-down economics for the umpteenth time.
Worse yet, the lack of an economic boost from a poorly designed fiscal program has been compounded by the drag from Trump's trade wars, which have now targeted pretty much every major U.S. ally and many less friendly nations.
Trump's seemingly intractable head-to-head with China, the world's second largest economy, is especially concerning to Wall Street—and to members of the Fed.
"Strong labor markets and rising incomes continued to support the outlook for consumer spending, but modest growth in prices and wages suggested that inflation pressures remained muted. Inflation had continued to run below the Committee's 2% symmetric objective," the minutes said, a sign that economic activity is still running below potential despite a low unemployment rate.
Investors will now look to Fed Chair Jerome Powell's Jackson Hole speech for clues as to the future of monetary policy, after he offered mixed messages last month during an awkward post-meeting press conference.
For now, many are expecting more cuts ahead.
"We continue to expect the Committee to cut rates by a further 25 basis points at its September and December meetings, and by another 25 basis points in the second quarter of 2020," wrote BNP Paribas economists in a research note.
"We think the risks lie towards the FOMC delivering more than the 75 basis points of cuts we currently forecast over that time-frame."">
The Federal Reserve can pretty be mentioned to be slicing rates of interest due to Donald Trump. However the transfer has little to do with the unprecedented and buffoonish ranges of political stress this president is inserting on the U.S. central financial institution, whose functioning is essential to home and world financial stability.
As an alternative, Fed officers made clear in minutes from their July 30-31 assembly launched this week that they’re, as an alternative, reacting to Trump’s erratic mismanagement of the financial system.
Naturally the Fed, which is in search of greater than ever to claim its political independence now that it is going through frequent Twitter tirades from the White Home, didn’t point out Trump by identify.
However the vestiges of his deepening commerce conflict, and the impression it’s having on world financial system and in flip the US, have been cited because the main rationale for the easing of financial circumstances, which represented an about-face from predictions of a hike as just lately as late 2018.
Officers with a present vote on the Federal Open Market Committee mentioned that whereas “the general outlook remained favorable, important dangers and uncertainties attending the outlook remained.”
The supply of uncertainty was distinctly Trumpian: “Particularly, sluggish U.S. enterprise mounted funding spending and manufacturing output had lingered, suggesting that dangers and uncertainties related to weak world financial development and in worldwide commerce have been weighing on the home financial system.”
Recall, boosting enterprise funding was alleged to be a key justification for Trump’s company tax cuts. Issues have not fairly panned out that method, disproving Republican trickle-down economics for the umpteenth time.
Worse but, the dearth of an financial increase from a poorly designed fiscal program has been compounded by the drag from Trump’s commerce wars, which have now focused just about each main U.S. ally and lots of much less pleasant nations.
Trump’s seemingly intractable head-to-head with China, the world’s second largest financial system, is particularly regarding to Wall Avenue—and to members of the Fed.
“Robust labor markets and rising incomes continued to help the outlook for shopper spending, however modest development in costs and wages recommended that inflation pressures remained muted. Inflation had continued to run beneath the Committee’s 2% symmetric goal,” the minutes mentioned, an indication that financial exercise remains to be operating beneath potential regardless of a low unemployment price.
Traders will now look to Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s Jackson Gap speech for clues as to the way forward for financial coverage, after he provided blended messages final month throughout an ungainly post-meeting press convention.
For now, many predict extra cuts forward.
“We proceed to anticipate the Committee to chop charges by an extra 25 foundation factors at its September and December conferences, and by one other 25 foundation factors within the second quarter of 2020,” wrote BNP Paribas economists in a analysis word.
“We predict the dangers lie in the direction of the FOMC delivering greater than the 75 foundation factors of cuts we presently forecast over that timeframe.”