Do you assume over the long run, to illustrate subsequent 10 years, you’ll return 5% yearly, 10% yearly? 20% yearly?
I believed it will be an attention-grabbing query to ask, as I’m at the moment trying on the prospectus for a few funding merchandise and located their annualised return during the last 10 years to be fairly attention-grabbing.
For instance, right here is the (internet of all prices/charges) efficiency of the “Man AHL Alpha (AUD)” fund, which is each lengthy and brief throughout all asset lessons represented in futs markets in addition to fairness sectors.
(from their newest month-to-month report https://www.gsfm.com.au/cms/wp-cont…port_-_Retail_Audience_English_30-07-2019.pdf)
Now this can be a fund that advertises itself as:
So if you happen to assume you’ll be able to obtain 10%, 20%, or extra p.a. over the long run, whereas a crew of 140+ extremely certified people with no constraints on capital or technique implementation can obtain solely 5% p.a. over the long run with a Sharpe ratio of 0.24 …what’s your reasoning for why you assume you are able to do higher?
For instance, one cause I would discover legitimate is if you happen to say “I commerce my system in way more unstable components of the markets so I anticipate my returns to be larger regardless that my Sharpe ratio can be about the identical”.
I do not wish to sound like I’m unfavorable about pattern following methods, in actual fact I implement a pair myself for governing sure publicity inside broad asset class envelopes. However I’m curious to see how peoples perceptions about their very own futures efficiency match up in opposition to the efficiency of greatest in breed systematic merchants and why they assume that.